Comments on: Camera Pictures http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/ the number of the donkeys is two. Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:05:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: shacker http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-866 shacker Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:41:58 +0000 http://www.sean-graham.com/?p=774#comment-866 <p>Ohhhh! I was looking for the porn connection. I'm barking up the wrong tree. Again.</p> Ohhhh! I was looking for the porn connection. I’m barking up the wrong tree. Again.

]]> By: grahams http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-865 grahams Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:39:24 +0000 http://www.sean-graham.com/?p=774#comment-865 <p>I think you mean <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Title?American%20Movie" rel="nofollow">American Movie</a>, which I have yet to see...</p> <p>I am starting to feel like "That guy who hasn't seen American Movie", though, as everyone I know has talked to me about it. :)</p> I think you mean American Movie, which I have yet to see…

I am starting to feel like “That guy who hasn’t seen American Movie”, though, as everyone I know has talked to me about it. :)

]]> By: grahams http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-864 grahams Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:38:01 +0000 http://www.sean-graham.com/?p=774#comment-864 <p>Awww... Scot, you're trying too hard...</p> <p><a href="http://www.nist.gov/" rel="nofollow">National Institute of Standards and Technology</a>, the government's standards bureau...</p> Awww… Scot, you’re trying too hard…

National Institute of Standards and Technology, the government’s standards bureau…

]]> By: shacker http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-863 shacker Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:35:34 +0000 http://www.sean-graham.com/?p=774#comment-863 <p>What was that mockumentary... "American Story" ??? :</p> <p>"This movie is so good it uses every f-stop known to man."</p> What was that mockumentary… “American Story” ??? :

“This movie is so good it uses every f-stop known to man.”

]]> By: shacker http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-862 shacker Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:34:15 +0000 http://www.sean-graham.com/?p=774#comment-862 <p>Okay, I give up - what's NIST? A google search on "NIST john holmes" yields ambiguous results. No relation to NAMBLA, I presume?</p> Okay, I give up – what’s NIST? A google search on “NIST john holmes” yields ambiguous results. No relation to NAMBLA, I presume?

]]> By: grahams http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-861 grahams Sat, 02 Feb 2002 13:17:58 +0000 http://www.sean-graham.com/?p=774#comment-861 <p>I don't think I have ever seen a good camera from a computer manufacturer.... Adam has a Epson that is the biggest piece of crap I have ever used...</p> <p>But then again, I could just be some bush-league photo-snob... I even know what an f-stop is... :)</p> I don’t think I have ever seen a good camera from a computer manufacturer…. Adam has a Epson that is the biggest piece of crap I have ever used…

But then again, I could just be some bush-league photo-snob… I even know what an f-stop is… :)

]]> By: grahams http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-860 grahams Sat, 02 Feb 2002 13:12:17 +0000 http://www.sean-graham.com/?p=774#comment-860 <p>BTW, that "400 Pictures" figure was shooting at 1152x864, there would obviously be alot more pictures stored at 640x480</p> BTW, that “400 Pictures” figure was shooting at 1152×864, there would obviously be alot more pictures stored at 640×480

]]> By: grahams http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-859 grahams Sat, 02 Feb 2002 13:11:31 +0000 http://www.sean-graham.com/?p=774#comment-859 <p>I can't remember the exact figures, but it had something to do with NIST and John Holmes dong...</p> I can’t remember the exact figures, but it had something to do with NIST and John Holmes dong…

]]> By: shacker http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-858 shacker Sat, 02 Feb 2002 12:38:12 +0000 http://www.sean-graham.com/?p=774#comment-858 <p>Thanks for the recommendation. I defnitely believe it makes sense to buy a camera from a film and/or camera maker, rather than a computer / printer maker. Have heard many good things about Kodak cameras.</p> Thanks for the recommendation. I defnitely believe it makes sense to buy a camera from a film and/or camera maker, rather than a computer / printer maker. Have heard many good things about Kodak cameras.

]]> By: shacker http://sean-graham.com/2002/02/01/camera-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-857 shacker Sat, 02 Feb 2002 12:36:46 +0000 http://www.sean-graham.com/?p=774#comment-857 <p>What's the imperial equivalent of a metric fuckton?</p> What’s the imperial equivalent of a metric fuckton?

]]>